ArticlePloS one2025
Stories that bridge us: A mixed methods study to understand the impact of a hospital-wide storytelling event.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral storytelling events for healthcare professionals are gaining in popularity, yet evaluation of these initiatives is scarce. We designed and assessed the impact of a hospital-wide storytelling event at an academic medical center in New England. This study was grounded in social constructivism, which posits that knowledge and collaborative meaning-making are socially constructed through interpersonal interactions and shared language. Stories were solicited from interdisciplinary staff on a theme, and six selected storytellers were paired with coaches. The hybrid in-person/virtual event was held in 2021. Attendees were invited to complete a post-event survey, as well as a semi-structured interview or written response. Storytellers were invited to reflect via a post-event focus group or written responses. Qualitative data were coded using a mixed inductive and deductive content analytic approach. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The storytellers included representation from internal and emergency medicine, nursing, infrastructure project management, and research administration. The 155 attendees included 25 in-person/130 virtual. Qualitative data (nine participants) revealed that sharing stories fostered interpersonal connection and a sense of common humanity, enhanced by the storytellers' vulnerability and diversity. Storytellers valued coaches' emotional and creative support in co-creating stories with them. Lastly, the event was felt to strengthen the hospital community. These themes were echoed in the survey data (30 participants): > 75% of respondents indicated that the event helped them reflect on their values, connect with others, and access a sense of purpose. A multidisciplinary hospital-wide oral storytelling event is one way to enhance self-reflection, interpersonal connection, and a sense of community among healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.