Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40577401›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Taxes to red and processed meat to promote sustainable and healthy diets in Mexico.

Kaela Connors, Juan A Rivera, Peter Alexander, Lindsay M Jaacks, Carolina Batis, Dalia Stern, Martín Lajous, M Arantxa Colchero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kaela ConnorsSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-6949-7583
Juan A RiveraCenter for Research in Population Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2586-4908
Peter AlexanderSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Lindsay M JaacksGlobal Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7791-5167
Carolina BatisCenter for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Dalia SternSECIHTI-Center for Research on Population Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Martín LajousCenter for Research in Population Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
M Arantxa ColcheroCenter for Evaluation and Surveys, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsumption of red and processed meat is above sustainable and healthy dietary targets in Mexico. Policies to promote greater adherence such as taxing meat are needed to reduce consumption. Here, we evaluated how price increases to red and processed meat could shift consumption for meat as well as other key food groups.

methodsUsing data from the Mexican National Household Income and Expenditure Survey (2018, 2020, 2022), we estimated own- and cross-price elasticities of demand for 10 food groups. These were used to predict changes in quantity demanded of each food group according to price increase scenarios.

resultsPrice increases to meat increased demand for substitutes such as fruits and vegetables, legumes, poultry, and seafood, and reduced demand for salty snacks, sweets and sugary beverages. Substantial increases to the price of processed meat markedly reduced processed meat consumption, increased consumption of protein- and nutrient-rich foods, and resulted in more modest levels of red meat consumption. Lower-income groups were more sensitive to price increases but still met dietary recommendations for meat and substituted these foods with alternatives such as legumes and seafood.

conclusionsIncreasing the price of red and processed meat through a tax may promote greater adherence to sustainable and healthy dietary targets in Mexico. It simultaneously increased demand for healthier substitutes, and reduced demand for unhealthy complements. Substantially raising the price of processed meat only may be an effective strategy for addressing diet-related risk factors, while delivering environmental benefits. Additionally, meat taxes have the potential to promote improvements in diet quality and equitable health outcomes.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyMeat ProductsRed MeatTaxesHumansMexico

Identifiers

PMID40577401
PMCPMC12204545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.