Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40577373›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Behavioral Innovations to Access Abortion Post-Dobbs: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Reddit's r/abortion Community in 2022.

Eliza Dolgins, Lindsay Parham, Karen Weidert, Emma Anderson, Coye Cheshire, Ndola Prata, Elizabeth Pleasants

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eliza DolginsUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1283-8057
Lindsay ParhamUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Karen WeidertUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Emma AndersonUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Coye CheshireUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Ndola PrataUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Elizabeth PleasantsUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8435-5682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the leak of the Dobbs decision in 2022, abortion access in the United States has faced heightened barriers, including legal restrictions, financial constraints, and logistical challenges. In response, individuals seeking abortion care can employ innovative behavioral strategies to overcome these barriers and reshape their abortion experiences (ie, "behavioral innovations"). This paper explores the behavioral innovations to access abortion that people discussed and recommended within a geographically dispersed community of peers on an abortion-supportive Reddit community (r/abortion). Using a hybrid inductive and deductive thematic qualitative analysis approach with a purposive sample of comments in the r/abortion community in 2022 following the

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedHealth Services AccessibilityFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchUnited Statesabortionbarriers to abortion accessbehavioral innovationspost-DobbsRedditUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40577373
PMCPMC12205189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.