Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40577353›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

ChunkUIE: Chunked instruction-based unified information extraction.

Wei Li, Yingzhen Liu, Yinling Yang, Ting Zhang, Wei Men

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei LiNational Defense University, Beijing, China.
Yingzhen LiuState Key Laboratory of Geo-Information Engineering, Beijing, China.
Yinling YangBeijing Gengtu Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Ting ZhangSchool of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Wei MenBeijing Gengtu Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-9602-8870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across various linguistic tasks. However, existing LLMs perform inadequately in information extraction tasks for both Chinese and English. Numerous studies attempt to enhance model performance by increasing the scale of training data. However, discrepancies in the number and type of schemas used during training and evaluation can harm model effectiveness. To tackle this challenge, we propose ChunkUIE, a unified information extraction model that supports Chinese and English. We design a chunked instruction construction strategy that randomly and reproducibly divides all schemas into chunks containing an identical number of schemas. This approach ensures that the union of schemas across all chunks encompasses all schemas. By limiting the number of schemas in each instruction, this strategy effectively addresses the performance degradation caused by inconsistencies in schema counts between training and evaluation. Additionally, we construct some challenging negative schemas using a predefined hard schema dictionary, which mitigates the model's semantic confusion regarding similar schemas. Experimental results demonstrate that ChunkUIE enhances zero-shot performance in information extraction.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalLanguageLinguisticsAlgorithmsHumansSemantics

Identifiers

PMID40577353
PMCPMC12204470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.