ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2025
Three-Dimensional Printing in Breast Radiation Therapy: A Scoping Review of the Literature.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTissue equivalent bolus is used to increase dose to skin and superficial tissue in adjuvant breast or chest wall radiation therapy. Three-dimensional (3D) printed bolus offers a customised conformal device and potential for improved anatomic conformity and dose distribution.
methodsA literature search was defined as per PRISMA guidelines for scoping review. Inclusion criteria were determined using PICO guidelines. The parameters of interest, including year, journal, study type, intervention details, clinical sample size and pre-clinical case numbers, were extracted from each article. The reported outcomes, such as dosimetry, anatomic conformity, dose to organs at risk and toxicity data were recorded.
resultsThirteen publications were reviewed, six studies were pre-clinical and seven were clinical. Ten were performed in the post-mastectomy setting and utilised polylactic acid (PLA) bolus. Overall, most studies reported marginal improvement in dosimetry, anatomic conformity, organ at risk dosimetry and toxicity with 3D printed bolus. However, sample sizes utilised were small and study design was variable with unusual choices of comparator arm and introduction of other variables.
conclusionThree-dimensional printed bolus is an emerging technology in radiation oncology. Most available data in the setting of breast radiation therapy is positive, though interpretation of results is difficult given the small sample sizes and variable study design. Further investigations in larger cohorts in a clinical setting is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.