Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40577312›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

Human attention-guided visual perception is governed by rhythmic oscillations and aperiodic timescales.

Isabel Raposo, Ian C Fiebelkorn, Jack J Lin, Josef Parvizi, Sabine Kastner, Robert T Knight, Assaf Breska, Randolph F Helfrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isabel RaposoHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University Medical Center Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9036-1341
Ian C FiebelkornUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Jack J LinDepartment of Neurology, UC Davis, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Josef ParviziDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, California, United States of America.
Sabine KastnerPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Robert T KnightDepartment of Psychology and the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Assaf BreskaMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Randolph F HelfrichHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University Medical Center Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8045-3111

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Attention, Orientation and the Human Prefrontal CortexR01NS021135 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 1985 to 2026
$6.5M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS021135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention samples visual space sequentially to enhance behaviorally relevant sensory representations. While traditionally conceptualized as a static continuous spotlight, contemporary models of attention highlight its discrete nature. But which neural mechanisms govern the temporally precise allocation of attention? Periodic brain activity as exemplified by neuronal oscillations as well as aperiodic temporal structure in the form of intrinsic neural timescales have been proposed to orchestrate the attentional sampling process in space and time. However, both mechanisms have been largely studied in isolation. To date, it remains unclear whether periodic and aperiodic temporal structure reflect distinct neural mechanisms. Here, we combined computational simulations with a multimodal approach encompassing five experiments, and three different variants of classic spatial attention paradigms, to differentiate aperiodic from oscillatory-based sampling. Converging evidence across behavior as well as scalp and intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) revealed that periodic and aperiodic temporal regularities can theoretically and experimentally be distinguished. Our results extend the rhythmic sampling framework of attention by demonstrating that aperiodic neural timescales predict behavior in a spatially-, context-, and demand-dependent manner. Aperiodic timescales increased from sensory to association cortex, decreased during sensory processing or action execution, and were prolonged with increasing behavioral demands. These results reveal that multiple, concurrent temporal regularities govern attentional sampling.

Indexed as

AttentionVisual PerceptionAdultBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePeriodicityPhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40577312
PMCPMC12204476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.