ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2026
Resolving the Ambiguity of Complete-to-Partial Point Cloud Registration for Image-Guided Liver Surgery With Patches-to-Partial Matching.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- ARport: an augmented reality system for markerless image-guided port placement in robotic surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Toward Patient-Specific Partial Point Cloud to Surface Completion for Pre to Intra-operative Registration in Image-Guided Liver Interventions.Medical Image Understanding and Analysis. Medical Image Understanding and Analysis (Conference) · 2026Article
- Assessing Learning-Based Reconstructed Liver Surfaces From Partial Point Clouds for Improving Pre- to Intra-Operative 3D to 3D Registration.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In image-guided liver surgery, the initial rigid alignment between preoperative and intraoperative data, often represented as point clouds, is crucial for providing sub-surface information from preoperative CT/MRI images to the surgeon during the procedure. Currently, this alignment is typically performed using semi-automatic methods, which, while effective to some extent, are prone to errors that demand manual correction. Alternatively, correspondence-based point cloud registration methods further offer a promising fully automatic solution. However, they may struggle in scenarios with limited intraoperative surface visibility, a common challenge in liver surgery, particularly in laparoscopic procedures, which we refer to as complete-to-partial ambiguity. We first illustrate this ambiguity by evaluating the performance of state-of-the-art learning-based point cloud registration methods on our carefully constructed in silico and in vitro datasets. Then, we propose a patches-to-partial matching strategy as a plug-and-play module to resolve the ambiguity, which can be seamlessly integrated into learning-based registration methods without disrupting their end-to-end structure. This approach effectively improves registration performance, especially in low-visibility conditions, reducing registration errors to 6.7 mm ($-$29%) in silico and 12.5 mm ($-$40%) in vitro, compared to state-of-the-art performance achieved by Lepard of 9.5 mm and 20.7 mm, respectively. The constructed benchmark and the proposed module establish a solid foundation for advancing applications of point cloud correspondence-based registration methods in image-guided liver surgery. Our code and datasets will be released at https://github.com/zixinyang9109/P2P.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.