ArticlePloS one2025
RETRACTED: Wind energy resource assessment based on joint wolf pack intelligent optimization algorithm.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-04-08Concerns/Issues about Article · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wind energy is a clean and renewable energy source with great potential for development, but the intermittent and stochastic characteristics of wind speed have brought great challenges to the effective development and utilisation of wind energy resources, resulting in high development costs. Therefore, how to accurately assess the wind energy resources and effectively predict the wind speed has become a key issue to be solved in the current wind energy field. In view of this, the study proposes the Weibull model to model the wind speed data, and then introduces the wolf pack intelligent optimisation algorithm and improves it through the pollination mechanism to improve the accuracy of wind energy resource assessment. Secondly, considering the complexity and diversity of wind speed data characteristics, data decomposition technique, autoregressive moving average (ARIMA) model and cuckoo search algorithm are used to achieve data preprocessing, serial data modelling and hybrid prediction. The experimental results show that the Weibull model has good fitting accuracy for wind speed data, with residual sum of squares, RMSE, and average coefficient of determination of 0.05, 0.014, and 0.96, respectively, accurately reflecting the statistical characteristics of wind speed data. The wind speed prediction performance of the hybrid prediction model is good, with a maximum deviation of no more than 3% from the true value, which is significantly better than the compared VMD-ISOA-KELM model and CNN-BLSTM model, and its prediction error is relatively small. The hybrid prediction model has a smaller relative error value compared to a single algorithm, with a maximum value of less than 0.2. It has better prediction performance than the combination model, with a coefficient of determination approaching 1.0, a fitting accuracy of 0.994, a mean square error of 0.1947, a root mean square error of 0.3847, and an average absolute percentage error of 15.23%. And the research method can effectively evaluate the status of wind energy resources, with low time complexity at different data scales, taking no more than 5 seconds, and improving operational efficiency. This research method can provide strong technical support and reference basis for the development and utilisation of wind energy resources, and help to promote the sustainable development of wind energy industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.