ArticlePloS one2025
Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in bone metastatic prostate cancer stratified by disease characteristics: A SEER-based retrospective analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced age increases cancer-specific mortality in bone-only metastatic prostate cancer: a SEER analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with newly diagnosed bone-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) remains insufficiently explored. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with newly diagnosed bone-metastatic PCa were retrospectively identified from the SEER-17 database and categorized into two groups based on local treatment: biopsy-only and RP. Notably, patients who had received radiotherapy were excluded due to the unavailability of radiotherapy target site details in the SEER database, which made it impossible to determine whether the radiotherapy was directed at metastatic lesions or the prostate. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Subgroup analyses stratified by T stage, N stage, PSA levels, and ISUP grade were conducted to assess the impact of disease characteristics on the efficacy of RP. A risk score incorporating these disease characteristics (T stage, N stage, PSA level, ISUP grade) was assigned to each patient, and risk-stratified subgroup analyses were performed to further evaluate the relationship between the efficacy of RP and overall disease characteristics.
resultsA total of 9,243 patients were included in this study, of whom 8,949 (96.8%) underwent biopsy alone and 294 (3.2%) underwent RP. Patients who underwent RP had better CSS (adjusted HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.23-0.44, p < 0.001; 5-year CSS rate: 83.0% vs. 44.5%) and OS (adjusted HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.26-0.45, p < 0.001; 5-year OS rate: 79.2% vs. 36.9%) compared with patients who underwent biopsy alone. The survival benefit persisted across all subgroups but were attenuated in patients with more advanced stage (T3 and N1) and higher grades of disease (PSA > 72.5 ng/ml and ISUP grade IV-V). Risk score analysis revealed diminishing benefits with increasing scores. Significant survival benefits were observed for scores 0-3 (all adjusted HR < 1, p < 0.05), whereas no survival differences were detected at the highest risk score (CSS: adjusted HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 0.54-5.65, p = 0.356; OS: adjusted HR = 1.56, 95% CI: 0.48-5.04, p = 0.456).
conclusionSurvival benefits of RP in de novo bone metastatic prostate cancer are modulated by disease characteristics, with attenuated effects in advanced/high-grade disease. Risk-stratified patient selection is critical, and prospective studies are needed to validate optimal candidacy for RP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.