ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Combining Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy for Effective Removal of a Large Ureteral Stone: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large ureteral stones (LUSs) pose significant health risks, including chronic obstruction and renal impairment. Timely intervention is critical to preserve kidney function. While the optimal treatment for LUS is debated, retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU) is often preferred over percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), ureteroscopy, or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy due to its effectiveness. Combining RLU with antegrade flexible ureteroscopy (aFURS) can enhance stone clearance rates, addressing the challenges of intrarenal access and guidewire passage. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 65-year-old woman with a large proximal left ureteral stone (15×15×42 mm), renal atrophy, and severe hydronephrosis, presenting with persistent lumbar pain and intermittent hematuria. An urgent percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) improved her renal function, yet left renal GFR was low at 10.62 ml/min. Forty-seven days post-PCN, she underwent a combined procedure of RPLU and aFURS through the PCN tract. This approach ensured complete stone removal while minimizing ureteral trauma. The stone was successfully fragmented and removed, followed by antegrade double-J stenting. The patient experienced an uneventful recovery and was symptom-free at the 3-month follow-up. Imaging confirmed the absence of residual stones and strictures. CONCLUSIONS This case underscores the effectiveness and safety of combining RPLU and aFURS for large ureteral stone removal in a single session. It highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and surgical expertise in managing complex stone cases, offering insights into optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.