Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40577044›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Empowering Capabilities of People With Chronic Conditions Supported by Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review.

Messaline Fomo, Liyousew G Borga, Thomas Abel, Philip S Santangelo, Sara Riggare, Jochen Klucken, Ivana Paccoud

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Messaline FomoLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6948-4616
Liyousew G BorgaLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3840-1101
Thomas AbelInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6740-1149
Philip S SantangeloDepartment of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2733-701X
Sara RiggareParticipatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2256-7310
Jochen KluckenLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-9437
Ivana PaccoudLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1526-8013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient empowerment is widely recognized for improving health outcomes, increasing patient satisfaction, and enhancing the overall effectiveness of health care. Digital health technologies (DHTs) contribute to this empowerment by keeping patients informed, involved, and engaged in their own health. However, more evidence is needed to better understand which aspects of empowerment patients value when using DHTs and how DHTs can support these values.

objectiveDrawing on Sen's capability approach, this paper conceptualizes patient empowerment in digital health by defining distinct capabilities, resources, and conversion factors that contribute to patient empowerment through DHTs.

methodsWe based our scoping review on the methodology recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for evidence synthesis and an a priori registered protocol. Papers were included if they focused on patient empowerment in relation to DHTs among patients with chronic diseases (cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases), with particular emphasis on the patient perspective. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for evidence published from January 2013 to April 2024. Data were extracted and thematically analyzed via a multidisciplinary workshop to identify empowerment components relevant to the capability framework, such as capabilities, DHTs as resources, and conversion factors.

resultsOur analysis identified 3 core capabilities to achieve patient empowerment supported by DHTs: health information and knowledge management, self-management, and emotional and social support. DHTs as resources supported these capabilities through distinct functional components, including informing patients, communication with the health care team, monitoring, behavior change interventions, individualized feedback, or peer support, each contributing to a varying degree. Conversion factors such as demographic and socioeconomic status, digital literacy, disease status, perceived value of DHTs, sociocultural values and norms, doctor-patient relationship, connectivity, and cost influenced the development of empowering capabilities resulting from using DHTs.

conclusionsWhile the capabilities related to patient empowerment in DHTs were clearly distinguishable, our analysis revealed a notable interconnectedness among these components. Our conceptualization of patient empowerment serves as a valuable resource for researchers seeking to understand or assess patient empowerment via DHTs. It also provides guidance for DHT developers, helping them design DHTs that enhance valued capabilities and account for the conversion factors and ultimately promote patient empowerment across diverse population groups.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyEmpowermentPatient ParticipationChronic DiseaseDigital HealthHumansTelemedicinecapability approachchronic diseasesdigital healthdigital health technologypatient empowerment

Identifiers

PMID40577044
PMCPMC12254712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.