Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576972›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

Health Information Systems' Support for Management and Changing Work: Survey Study Among Physicians.

Tarja Heponiemi, Lotta Virtanen, Emma Kainiemi, Petra Saukkonen, Jarmo Reponen, Tinja Lääveri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tarja HeponiemiDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, 00271, Finland, 358 295247434.ORCID 0000-0001-8540-049X
Lotta VirtanenDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, 00271, Finland, 358 295247434.ORCID 0000-0001-9364-5219
Emma KainiemiDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, 00271, Finland, 358 295247434.ORCID 0000-0003-3808-8514
Petra SaukkonenDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, 00271, Finland, 358 295247434.ORCID 0000-0003-3035-4451
Jarmo ReponenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2306-3111
Tinja LääveriDepartment of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4124-6667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The digitalization of health care has advanced significantly in recent years. Consequently, physicians have needed to increasingly adopt new digital health technologies such as electronic health record systems and other health information systems. Digitalization has changed physicians' clinical work, work environment, management work, and use of tools for leadership. Many physician leaders have been critical of the capabilities of health information systems (HISs) to support leadership, management, and knowledge management. Objective: We aimed to examine the association between leadership position and perceived changes in clinical work due to digitalization among a nationally representative sample of Finnish physicians and physician leaders. In addition, we examined physician leaders' perceptions of HISs as a support for management and whether their opinions differed based on their perceptions on changes in clinical work due to digitalization. Methods: Altogether 4630 Finnish physicians (2960/4586, 64% women) responded to a cross-sectional nation-wide web-based survey conducted in spring 2021. Perceptions of improved preventive work, facilitated access to patient information, progressed interprofessional collaboration, and accelerated clinical encounters were used as measures of changes due to digitalization. First, we examined with multivariable logistic regression analyses whether being in a leadership position was associated with perceived changes in work due to digitalization (improved preventive work, facilitated access to patient information, progressed interprofessional collaboration, and accelerated clinical encounters in separate analyses) in the total sample. Second, we examined with analyses of covariance whether the variables related to perceived changes in work due to digitalization were associated with perceived management support from HISs among those who had administrative or management responsibilities (n=817). All analyses were adjusted for gender, age, and sector. Results: Physician leaders had greater odds of agreeing that digitalization had improved preventive work (odds ratio [OR] 1.62, 95% CI 1.33-1.98), facilitated access to patient information (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.51), progressed interprofessional collaboration (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.53-2.14), and accelerated clinical encounters (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.70) than those in nonleadership positions. Furthermore, leaders who perceived these changes in work due to digitalization positively also considered that health information systems supported their management work. Conclusions: Physician leaders appeared to view the changes in work due to digitalization more positively than other physicians. In addition, those leaders who perceived these changes positively also perceived that HISs supported their management work. Thus, leaders should thoroughly evaluate and address physicians' perceptions of their routine clinical work and its evolving nature. Doing so ensures access to up-to-date and accurate insights, enabling more effective planning of staffing, training programs, and future implementations. Furthermore, our results show that to guarantee positive views about digitalization among physician leaders, information systems should also support managerial work. This highlights the need to focus on the quality, utility, and usability of information systems.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsPhysiciansAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansLeadershipMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescross sectionaldigitalizationFinlandhealth care digitalizationhealth information systemsinformation systemleadershipleadership positionmanagementmonitoringonline surveypatient informationphysician leaderssupportsurveywork change

Identifiers

PMID40576972
PMCPMC12226959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.