Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576964›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2025

Exploring the Quality of Physical Therapy in Patients With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis in Germany: A Cross-Sectional, Vignette-Based Study.

Franziska Weber, Corelien Kloek, Max Bonk, Christian Grüneberg, Cindy Veenhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Franziska WeberDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Hochschule Bochum (Bochum University of Applied Sciences), 44801 Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Corelien KloekResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Knowledge Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Max BonkDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Hochschule Bochum (Bochum University of Applied Sciences), 44801 Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Christian GrünebergDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Hochschule Bochum (Bochum University of Applied Sciences), 44801 Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Cindy VeenhofDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science & Sport, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceConservative, non-pharmacological interventions are the recommended first-line treatment for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), such as those from the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI), guide evidence-based care by physical therapists. However, no studies in Germany have examined physical therapists' treatment choices across patient cases and compared them with the latest evidence.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate to what extent physical therapists meet the latest evidence when treating different types of people with hip or knee OA. DESIGN AND

settingA cross-sectional vignette-based online survey was conducted among physical therapists working in outpatient practices.

participantsEligible participants had adequate German language skills, internet access, and recent experience treating patients with hip or knee OA. MEASURES: The survey included 4 case vignettes of hip or knee OA, with and without comorbidities, and a list of treatment modalities from the OARSI guideline. Correct selections matched high-evidence recommendations. Descriptive statistics analyzed demographics and treatment choices; linear regression assessed the influence of professional degree and work experience on meeting the latest evidence.

resultsOf 612 eligible therapists, 335 (54.7%) completed the survey (mean age 35.9+/-11.9 years; 60% female). Only 22% selected all recommended modalities across vignettes. Structured exercise (96%) and arthritis education (95%) were the most frequently chosen. However, many therapists also selected interventions with limited or conflicting evidence, such as massage and taping. Both professional degree and work experience significantly influenced the extent to which the latest evidence was met. Additionally, 49% were aware of at least 1 OA guideline. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While many physical therapists aligned with evidence-based practices, inappropriate modality selection remained common. De-implementation is needed where evidence suggests a lack of benefit or potential safety concerns. Translating and implementing the OARSI guideline into various languages, specifically for physical therapists, is recommended to close knowledge gaps. IMPACT: The study's findings underscore the importance of understanding the treatment modalities used by physical therapists in managing hip or knee OA worldwide. This insight is crucial for addressing the evidence-to-practice gap and ensuring the effective implementation of high-quality physical therapy, a need that is equally relevant in other countries. Additionally, this knowledge is vital for developing targeted strategies, such as the creation and integration of (de-)implementation protocols into the education and ongoing professional development of physical therapists globally.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneePhysical TherapistsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesEvidence-basedOsteoarthritisPhysical TherapyVignettes

Identifiers

PMID40576964
PMCPMC12397969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.