ArticleEnvironmental entomology2025
Oviposition deterrent as a component of a push-pull management approach for Drosophila suzukii.
Article in Environmental entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sweet Fennel Essential Oil RepelsInsects · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drosophila suzukii, spotted-wing drosophila, is a major pest of berries and cherries worldwide that attacks fruits at the ripening stage shortly before harvest. Recently, a mixture of octanoic acid and decanoic acid was developed as a 2-component oviposition deterrent (2c) as an alternative to spatial repellents for the behavioral control of spotted-wing drosophila infestation. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the oviposition deterrent as a "push" component in a spotted-wing drosophila push-pull, in combination with a previously identified 4-component spotted-wing drosophila attractant (4c) as the "pull", and compared the effect of push (2c), pull (4c), push-pull (2c + 4c), and control on spotted-wing drosophila oviposition in the laboratory and field. In both laboratory choice and no-choice bioassays using raspberry agar as an oviposition substrate, the pull treatment alone (4c) did not result in oviposition reduction. In contrast, both 2c and 2c + 4c resulted in a similar level of reduction in spotted-wing drosophila oviposition compared to control, indicating limited efficacy of the 4c as a pull as tested in this study. Similar results were also observed in the field, where fewer spotted-wing drosophila pupae emerged from raspberries from the 2c or 2c + 4c treated raspberries compared to untreated control, for both ripening field raspberries and store-bought sentinel raspberries. No significant difference in spotted-wing drosophila infestation was observed between control and 4c treatment. Our results suggest that an oviposition deterrent has a potential use as a push component in spotted-wing drosophila push-pull.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.