Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Short‑term outcomes of switching to faricimab for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.
Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Faricimab: current evidence for the treatment of retinal vein occlusion.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Pooled it
- Six-Month Real-World Data in Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion Treated with Faricimab: Swiss Retina Research Network Report.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and safety of intravitreal faricimab for macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Review
- Extended Real-World Efficacy of Faricimab in Therapy-Resistant Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion: 9-Month Follow-Up Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated the anatomical and functional outcomes in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) who were switched from conventional anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents to faricimab. STUDY
designRetrospective observational study.
methodsThis study included 42 eyes from 42 patients treated at Hikichi Eye Clinic between April and August 2024. All patients had relapsed ME despite prior treatment with aflibercept and were switched to intravitreal faricimab (6.0 mg). The primary endpoints included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and intravitreal injection intervals over six months.
resultsThe mean (± standard error) CFT significantly decreased from 356 ± 23 μm to 214 ± 3 μm at one month (p < 0.01) and remained stable at the final visit (205 ± 4 μm). Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA improved from 0.16 ± 0.03 to 0.04 ± 0.03 at one month (p < 0.01) and remained at 0.02 ± 0.02 at the final visit. The mean injection interval was significantly extended from 12.3 ± 0.4 weeks to 16.2 ± 0.5 weeks (p < 0.01).
conclusionFaricimab improved anatomical and functional outcomes while extending treatment intervals in ME secondary to RVO. Further large-scale, prospective, and long-term follow-up studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40576882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.