ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
The use of indocyanine green and technetium-99 for dual-tracer sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Establishing a standardized robotic approach for technetium-99 m-defined sentinel lymph node dissection with indocyanine green-guided navigation in da Vinci Xi & SP system.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Triple-Tracer Sentinel Node Mapping: Maximizing Detection, Minimizing Dissection.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to determine if indocyanine green (ICG) is a suitable replacement for blue dye for dual-tracer sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).
methodsA single-center retrospective review of female breast cancer patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent SLNB with technetium-99 (Tc
resultsOne hundred and nineteen SLNBs were performed on 117 patients. At least one radioactive or fluorescent SLN was identified in 93.2% of all patients. The mean number of SLNs retrieved per SLNB was 1.6 (fluorescent, 1.5; radioactive, 1.5). Of all excised SLNs, 89.4% were fluorescent, 88.4% were radioactive, and 81.9% were both fluorescent and radioactive. SLN metastases were present in 26 patients (22.2%); of SLNs identified with metastases on pathologic examination, 87.2% were fluorescent, 74.4% were radioactive, and 71.8% were both radioactive and fluorescent. Two patients (1.7%) experienced skin flap necrosis and one patient (0.9%) experienced prolonged skin discoloration. No patients experienced allergic reactions.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that SLN identification rates using ICG and Tc
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.