Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576863›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

Analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the stage at diagnosis in breast cancer patients at a French comprehensive cancer centre, through two different methods: a preliminary study.

Alessandra Zago, Emilie Lévêque, Aline Augustynen, Marianne Leheurteur, Marie Ottaviani, Agnès Loeb, Thomas Vermeulin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandra ZagoPublic Health and Cancer Prevention Service, Henri Becquerel Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Rue d'Amiens, CS 11516, 76038, Rouen, France. alessandra.zago@chb.unicancer.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9923-8531
Emilie LévêqueUnit of Clinical Research, Henri Becquerel Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Rouen, France.
Aline AugustynenPublic Health and Cancer Prevention Service, Henri Becquerel Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Rue d'Amiens, CS 11516, 76038, Rouen, France.
Marianne LeheurteurDepartment of Oncology, Henri Becquerel Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Rouen, France.
Marie OttavianiDepartment of Surgery, Henri Becquerel Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Rouen, France.
Agnès LoebPublic Health and Cancer Prevention Service, Henri Becquerel Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Rue d'Amiens, CS 11516, 76038, Rouen, France.
Thomas VermeulinPublic Health and Cancer Prevention Service, Henri Becquerel Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Rue d'Amiens, CS 11516, 76038, Rouen, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn early 2020, the Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic led to widespread lockdowns, disrupting cancer-screening programs and limiting access to care. Although a temporary drop in new breast cancer diagnosis had been noted, variations in stage of disease have been explored less frequently, and with methodological approaches that might lead to imprecise or approximative results. This preliminary study aimed to assess possible variations in breast cancer stage at diagnosis over a long-time period using two different approaches.

methodsWe analysed data from 3 787 women with invasive breast cancer treated at our comprehensive cancer centre between 2017 and 2022. We evaluated changes in proportions of staging parameters using two different approaches: a traditional "pre-to-post pandemic" traditional comparison and time series models. The latter included ARIMA (AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average) models, complemented by the research of potential significant estimated structural breakpoints over time in linear regression models.

resultsThe pre-to-post comparison suggested an overall positive overview of the differences observed before and after the pandemic. However, ARIMA and logistic models demonstrated a relative stability in tumour size and metastatic status, with only one significant breakpoint observed: a shift in the rate of patients with no lymph node involvement (N0), likely unrelated to the pandemic.

conclusionsThis is the first study to assess changes in breast cancer stage at diagnosis using time series and structural breakpoint analysis over an extended period. Our preliminary results highlight the importance of using advanced statistical techniques when evaluating the impact of systemic disruptions (like COVID-19) on cancer care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19AdultAgedCancer Care FacilitiesFemaleFranceHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Breast cancerCOVID-19Health services accessibilityPublic health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.