ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Advantages of the Da Vinci robotic system in choledochal cyst surgery: a multi-dimensional comparative study with traditional laparoscopic techniques.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for benign liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Challenges and opportunities in the implementation of a new robotic system - a semi-structured interview study with a surgical team.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted radical resection for choledochal cysts in infants under three months of age: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic-assisted surgery for choledochal cyst in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Robotic excision of choledochal cysts with Roux-en-Y hepatico-jejunostomy in children: surgical technique, experience and outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical technology signifies a substantial advancement in pediatric surgery for the treatment of congenital structural malformations. This research endeavor aims to perform a comprehensive comparative analysis of the therapeutic efficacy and assess the clinical applicability and value of the Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical method in relation to the conventional laparoscopic surgical technique, particularly in the management of congenital choledochal cysts. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 117 pediatric patients diagnosed with congenital choledochal cysts, who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University between January 2019 and October 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the surgical approach: the robot-assisted surgery group (RS group, n = 45) and the traditional laparoscopic surgery group (LS group, n = 72). Basic demographic and clinical data, perioperative parameters-including operation duration and intraoperative blood loss-and postoperative complications were systematically collected and statistically analyzed for both groups. The operating time in the robotic surgery (RS) group was 224.5 (203.3, 247.7) minutes, significantly longer than the 190.2 (170.5, 219.7) minutes recorded in the laparoscopic surgery (LS) group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). No conversions to open surgery occurred in either group. Intraoperative blood loss in the RS group was 11.5 (9.4, 13.4) ml, which was significantly less than the 19.8 (14.7, 26.6) ml observed in the LS group (P < 0.001). The postoperative drainage tube retention time was 4.5 (4, 6) days in the RS group compared to 5.8 (4, 7) days in the LS group, with a statistically significant difference (z = -3.285, P = 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay averaged 9 (7, 11) days for the RS group, while the LS group had an average of 11 (10, 13) days, also showing a statistically significant difference (z = -4.520, P < 0.001). During the follow-up period, complications were reported in 1 case [2.22% (1/45)] in the RS group, whereas 6 cases [8.33% (6/72)] were reported in the LS group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the two groups (P = 0.424). Robot-assisted treatment of congenital choledochal cysts is considered both safe and reliable. This technique minimizes the complexity of hepaticojejunal anastomosis and decreases the duration of the anastomosis. Furthermore, it provides several advantages, including reduced intraoperative blood loss, a low rate of postoperative complications, and a faster recovery period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.