Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576834›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2025

Sex- and gender-related differences in systemic lupus erythematosus: a scoping review.

Katinka Albrecht, Wiebke Troll, Johanna Callhoff, Anja Strangfeld, Sarah Ohrndorf, Johanna Mucke

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sex-dependent mechanisms in rheumatic diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A population-scale atlas of blood and tissue in lupus nephritis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Increased Susceptibility toLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katinka AlbrechtGerman Rheumatology Research Center Berlin, Program Area Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Berlin, Germany. albrecht@drfz.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0886-0294
Wiebke TrollAugenärztliches MVZ Fetscherplatz/Lockwitzgrund Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Johanna CallhoffGerman Rheumatology Research Center Berlin, Program Area Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3923-2728
Anja StrangfeldGerman Rheumatology Research Center Berlin, Program Area Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6233-022X
Sarah Ohrndorf *Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5943-4688
Johanna Mucke *Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8915-7837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A scoping review was conducted to compile evidence on sex-specific differences in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with focus on autoantibodies, organ manifestation, damage, treatment and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Systematic searches in PubMed and Cochrane were performed including meta-analyses, observational studies and clinical trials from 01/2015 to 11/2024. Studies of adults with SLE reporting outcomes by sex were eligible. The research protocol is registered in the Registry for Scoping Reviews (OSF, https://osf.io/gfbs9 ). From 373 screened articles, 81 publications were included. Studies comprised differences in autoantibodies (n = 13), damage (n = 40), organ involvement (n = 27), treatment (n = 14), and PROs (n = 6). Twenty studies compared proportions of outcomes by sex with patient numbers ranging from 98 to 11,943. The female/male ratio was between 4:1 and 11:1. The review found a higher age at onset in men and a higher proportion of positive lupus anticoagulant, nephritis, serositis, antiphospholipid syndrome, greater renal and cardiovascular damage and severe infections. SLE in women more often presented with Ro/SSA autoantibodies, alopecia, photosensitivity, Raynaud, and osteoporosis. Some studies showed more frequent cyclophosphamide and less frequent antimalarials in men. Little evidence indicated more frequent non-adherence with azathioprine and mycophenolate in women. Limited evidence was available for PROs. This review confirms significant sex differences in SLE, with men showing later onset, more severe organ damage, and distinct autoantibody and treatment patterns, while women more often present with Ro/SSA autoantibodies, photosensitivity, and osteoporosis. Evidence on patient-reported outcomes remains limited, highlighting the need for further research to guide sex-specific management.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicAge of OnsetAutoantibodiesFemaleHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSex FactorsAutoantibodiesAntirheumatic agentsGender differencesPatient-reported outcomesSex differencesSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID40576834
PMCPMC12204902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.