Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576831›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025

I Govindharaj, W Deva Priya, K L S Soujanya, K P Senthilkumar, K Shantha Shalini, S Ravichandran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

I GovindharajDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600062, India. govindharaji@veltech.edu.in.
W Deva PriyaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India.
K L S SoujanyaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, G. Narayanamma Institute of Technology and Science, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500104, India.
K P SenthilkumarDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Kings Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602117, India.
K Shantha ShaliniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 603104, India.
S RavichandranDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Kings Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602117, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of glaucoma represents a vital factor in securing vision while the disease retains its position as one of the central causes of blindness worldwide. The current glaucoma screening strategies with expert interpretation depend on complex and time-consuming procedures which slow down both diagnosis processes and intervention timing. This research adopts a complex automated glaucoma diagnostic system that combines optimized segmentation solutions together with classification platforms. The proposed segmentation approach implements an enhanced version of U-Net++ using dynamic parameter control provided by GWO to segment optic disc and cup regions in retinal fundus images. Through the implementation of GWO the algorithm uses wolf-pack hunting strategies to adjust parameters dynamically which enables it to locate diverse textural patterns inside images. The system uses a CapsNet capsule network for classification because it maintains visual spatial organization to detect glaucoma-related patterns precisely. The developed system secures an evaluation accuracy of 95.1% in segmentation and classification tasks better than typical approaches. The automated system eliminates and enhances clinical diagnostic speed as well as diagnostic precision. The tool stands out because of its supreme detection accuracy and reliability thus making it an essential clinical early-stage glaucoma diagnostic system and a scalable healthcare deployment solution. PURPOSE: To develop an advanced automated glaucoma diagnostic system by integrating an optimized U-Net++ segmentation model with a Capsule Network (CapsNet) classifier, enhanced through Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm (GWOA), for precise segmentation of optic disc and cup regions and accurate glaucoma classification from retinal fundus images.

methodsThis study proposes a two-phase computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) framework. In the segmentation phase, an enhanced U-Net++ model, optimized by GWOA, is employed to accurately delineate the optic disc and cup regions in fundus images. The optimization dynamically tunes hyperparameters based on grey wolf hunting behavior for improved segmentation precision. In the classification phase, a CapsNet architecture is used to maintain spatial hierarchies and effectively classify images as glaucomatous or normal based on segmented outputs. The performance of the proposed model was validated using the ORIGA retinal fundus image dataset, and evaluated against conventional approaches.

resultsThe proposed GWOA-UNet++ and CapsNet framework achieved a segmentation and classification accuracy of 95.1%, outperforming existing benchmark models such as MTA-CS, ResFPN-Net, DAGCN, MRSNet and AGCT. The model demonstrated robustness against image irregularities, including variations in optic disc size and fundus image quality, and showed superior performance across accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score metrics.

conclusionThe developed automated glaucoma detection system exhibits enhanced diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and reliability, offering significant potential for early-stage glaucoma detection and clinical decision support. Future work will involve large-scale multi-ethnic dataset validation, integration with clinical workflows, and deployment as a mobile or cloud-based screening tool.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGlaucomaNeural Networks, ComputerOptic DiskFundus OculiHumansIntraocular PressureReproducibility of ResultsAutomated diagnosisCapsNetGrey wolf techniquesMedical image segmentationRetinal image analysisVision preservation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.