Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576816›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Systematic investigation and comparison of diagnostic methods in implant-related infections and infectious non-unions in trauma surgery- results of a prospective study.

Robin Otchwemah, Rolf Lefering, Benedikt Marche, Thorsten Tjardes, Andreas Friedrich Wendel, Veronika Weichert, Marcel Dudda, Eva Steinhausen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robin OtchwemahInstitute of Hygiene, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, University Hospital of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany. robin.otchwemah@freenet.de.
Rolf LeferingInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Benedikt MarcheDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Cologne-Merheim, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Thorsten TjardesDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Cologne-Merheim, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Andreas Friedrich WendelInstitute of Hygiene, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, University Hospital of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Veronika WeichertDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Marcel DuddaDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Eva SteinhausenDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlongside surgical therapy, the successful treatment of infection-related nonunion depends on the accurate identification of pathogens so as to ensure targeted anti-infective treatment. The available diagnostic methods continue to exhibit low sensitivity. The aim of the study was to determine the most sensitive method for the accurate diagnosis of infection-related nonunion by comparing sonication with other diagnostic procedures.

methodsIn a prospective comparative study, 100 patients with nonunions (study group, SG) and 100 patients with planned metal removal (control group, CG) were compared. The diagnostic methods employed included standard culture, enrichment in blood culture bottles after tissue homogenization, sonication with and without membrane filtration, and histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.

resultsIn 133 patients (SG n = 73; CG n = 60), at least one sample was tested positive for a bacterium. Infection was diagnosed in 72 patients (SG n = 45; CG n = 27). Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Cutibacterium acnes were the most frequently detected pathogens. Sonication achieved the highest sensitivity (80.6%) for detecting an infection but there was no significant difference as compared to the other methods. The combination of standard culture and sonication yielded the greatest overall sensitivity (97.2%), whereas the combination of tissue homogenization and histology achieved the best results for specificity (89.1%) and predictive values (82.3%).

conclusionA high rate of pathogen detection was observed in clinically inapparent nonunions. Sonication was not clearly superior in our setting. In general, the combination of several diagnostic methods provided the most informative results. Therefore, sonication and tissue homogenization can both be considered useful additions to standard cultures.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalFractures, UnunitedProsthesis-Related InfectionsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySonicationFracture related infectionImplant-related infectionLow-grade-infectionNon-unionSonication

Identifiers

PMID40576816
PMCPMC12204920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.