Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576756›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025

Interrupted Systemic Therapy (Drug Holiday) for Metastatic Sarcoma: Is It Safe?

Alessandra Maleddu, Cole Wayant

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandra Maleddu *Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Ct, MS F704, Room 5328, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. alessandra.maleddu@cuanschutz.edu.
Cole Wayant *Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Ct, MS F704, Room 5328, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementSarcomas are a diverse group of rare, mesenchymal tumors that vary in terms of clinical behavior, aggressiveness, and responsiveness to treatment. The management of metastatic sarcoma is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Apart from a few subtypes of sarcomas that respond to targeted therapies, the vast majority of metastatic sarcomas are treated with chemotherapy regimens that have been unchanged for decades. These regimens are aggressive and cause clinically relevant toxicity. Despite this, treatment outcomes remain unsatisfactory and prognosis dismal. Metastatic disease is largely incurable, and new strategies are needed to simultaneously control metastatic disease while preserving patients' quality of life. For example, the optimal duration of palliative treatment for patients with metastatic sarcoma is unknown, as is the role and feasibility of planned treatment holidays. Whereas the benefit to patient quality of life from a treatment break can be easily predicted, it is not well understood the influence these treatment "holidays" have on overall survival (OS). Herein, we summarize the available literature on drug holidays in sarcoma and offer clinicians updated guidance for managing patients with metastatic disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsSarcomaDisease ManagementDrug Administration ScheduleHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisQuality of LifeTreatment InterruptionTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapy holidayPalliative chemotherapyPatient reported outcomesQuality of lifeSarcoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.