Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576751›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2025

Physiological and molecular responses of bread wheat and its wild relative species to drought stress.

Omid Jadidi, Alireza Pour-Aboughadareh, Jan Bocianowski, Bita Jamshidi, Leila Akbari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wheat Drought Management: A Broader Prospect.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Omid JadidiDepartment of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, 14778-93855, Iran.
Alireza Pour-AboughadarehSeed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, 31585-854, Iran. a.poraboghadareh@gmail.com.
Jan BocianowskiDepartment of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, Poznań, 60-637, Poland. jan.bocianowski@up.poznan.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0102-0084
Bita JamshidiDepartment of Food Security and Public Health, Khabat Technical Institute, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, 44001, Iraq.
Leila AkbariDepartment of Plant Genetics and Production, Campus of Agricultural & Natural Resources Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrought stress is a major abiotic factor limiting wheat productivity and threatening global food security. Understanding the mechanisms underlying drought tolerance in wheat and its wild relatives offers critical insights for breeding more tolerant cultivars. In this study, we investigated the physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and three of its wild relatives-Aegilops tauschii (genome DD), Ae. speltoides (genome BB), and T. urartu (genome AA)-under varying drought stress conditions to evaluate their adaptive strategies. METHODS AND

resultsPhysiological and biochemical parameters assessed included photosynthetic pigments [chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total chlorophyll (Chl T), and carotenoids (CAR)], stomatal conductance (SC), net photosynthesis rate (Pn), maximum primary and quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fo and Fv/Fm), relative water content (RWC), the activity of antioxidative enzymes [guaiacol peroxidases (GPX), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and superoxide dismutase (SOD)], and shoot dry matter (SDM). Additionally, the relative expression levels of three dehydrin (DHN ) genes (DHN5, DHN13, and DHN15) were analyzed across species. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that drought treatments had highly significant effects on all measured traits (except GPX) and the relative expression of DHN genes. Moreover, the main effect of species was significant for all traits except Chl b, Fv/Fm, RWC, Fv/Fo, CAT, APX, and SDM. The moderate drought (MD) stress led to reductions in the mean values of CAR content, Pn, FV/Fm, Fv/Fo, SC, RWC, and SDM, while other traits showed on increase relative to the control. Under severe drought (SD) treatment, a general decline in physiological traits and SDM was observed, accompanied by elevated biochemical activity and DHN gene expression. Notably, a strong correlation was identified between SOD activity and DHN gene expression under both drought treatments.

conclusionsAmong the species studied, Ae. speltoides and Ae. tauschii demonstrated the most pronounced resilience to drought stress, underscoring their superior adaptability under water-limited conditions. Their ability to maintain physiological integrity and enhance antioxidative enzyme activity suggests a promising genetic reservoir for improving drought tolerance in cultivated wheat. These findings highlight the importance of exploring wild germplasm to identify novel genes and alleles associated with drought tolerance, with potential implications for wheat breeding programs aimed at improving sustainability and productivity under climate stress.

Indexed as

DroughtsGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhotosynthesisPigments, BiologicalStress, PhysiologicalTriticumAntioxidantsBreadGenome, PlantAntioxidantsPigments, BiologicalAntioxidant enzymesGene expressionPhotosynthetic pigmentsWater deficitWheat germplasm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.