Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576737›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Self-reported quality of life in progressive cognitive decline-let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Irina Kinchin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Irina KinchinCentre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Dublin 2, Foster Pl, Ireland. Irina.Kinchin@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0133-2763

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing quality of life in progressive conditions like dementia presents unique challenges for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR). This commentary discusses current practices, highlighted by recent appraisals of lecanemab by NICE, where concerns about proxy-reported data-specifically, the risk of underestimating benefits-were noted as a limitation in the evaluation. While progressive cognitive decline complicates traditional self-reporting methodologies, emerging evidence demonstrates that adaptive strategies and technology-assisted methods can extend reliable self-reporting windows. The analysis identifies four critical challenges: (1) cognitive heterogeneity across dementia subtypes and stages clashing with HEOR's stable preference assumptions; (2) temporal fluctuations undermining single-timepoint assessments; (3) systematic discrepancies between self- and proxy-reported outcome data, inadequately addressed by current methods; and (4) the conceptual and psychometric limitations of current generic and condition-specific instruments. To address these challenges, the author advocates for a paradigm shift, inviting HEOR community to view diverse expressions of preference as a catalyst for innovation. This involves moving beyond static, binary preference assumptions to embrace dynamic, multimodal methods capturing non-verbal expressions in more advanced dementia. Proposed solutions include proxy calibration, an ecosystem of hybrid and graduated assessment integrating standardized domains with adaptable modules; reforming proxy protocols using Pickard's dual-gap framework to position proxy input as complementary, not substitutive; employing modern psychometrics and adopting relationship-centred engagement and process consent. Crucially, it calls for HEOR to integrate adaptive methods from adjacent fields-such as phenomenological inquiry, sensor technology, and data triangulation. These approaches can enhance the ability of HEOR to measure, value, and assess quality of life in the context of dementia and other progressive neurodegenerative conditions, ultimately anchoring value in lived experience and ensuring methodological limitations do not become barriers to accessing care and treatments.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaQuality of LifeSelf ReportHumansPsychometricsAssessmentCognitive justiceDementiaHealth economicsMethodological innovationProgressive conditionsProxy reportingQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID40576737
PMCPMC12431887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.