ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Principal Components for Practice-Oriented Measurement of Running Technique: A Proof-Of-Concept Study.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Heel-Strike Fallacy and Cadence Beliefs in Distance Running: A Narrative Review.Sports medicine - open · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to construct valid and practically applicable running technique measures using principal component analysis (PCA). We hypothesized that data-driven principal movements (PMs), derived from deliberately instructed opposite technique variations, would significantly distinguish these variations and could serve as quantitative measures of running technique as described by practitioners. 20 experienced runners were instructed to vary 14 distinct running technique elements into two opposing directions (e.g., forward and backward lean for a technique element representing horizontal movements). Elements and their variations were selected based on visual descriptions from practitioners found in running literature. Kinematic data were collected on a treadmill using optical motion capture and analyzed using a PCA-based approach to determine running-specific technique measures per technique element. By combining trials with opposing technique variations, variance in the data was purposefully produced, which in turn caused the resultant principal movements to align with the intended technique element. For all of the 14 technique elements, a valid measure-in the sense that the inputted opposite variations were significantly distinguishable within this measure-could be constructed. The measures could further be applied to the habitual running technique of the group of tested runners. The results of this study demonstrate the construct validity and applicability of the presented approach to measure running technique. This method can provide runners and coaches with valuable feedback and will enable future studies to investigate running technique, quantified through practice-informed measures, in the context of performance, injury risk, or adaptations to equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.