Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576499›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2025

Ultrathin Polymer Electrolyte With Fast Ion Transport and Stable Interface for Practical Solid-state Lithium Metal Batteries.

Shuixin Xia, Xiangfeng Zhang, Zongyan Jiang, Xiaoyan Wu, Jodie A Yuwono, Chenrui Li, Cheng Wang, Gemeng Liang, Mingnan Li, Fangli Zhang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Why Will Polymers Win the Race for Solid-State Batteries?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shuixin XiaSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5255-0739
Xiangfeng ZhangSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Zongyan JiangSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Xiaoyan WuSchool of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China.
Jodie A YuwonoSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Chenrui LiSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Cheng WangSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Gemeng LiangSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Mingnan LiSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Fangli ZhangSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Yi YuSchool of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China.
Yong JiangSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
Jianfeng MaoSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Shiyou ZhengSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Zaiping GuoSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-5301

Funding

Australian Research Council FL210100050Australian Research Council FT230100598National Key Research and Development Program 2023YFB250400National Natural Science Foundation of China 22179080National Natural Science Foundation of China 52271222National Natural Science Foundation of China 52371230Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 22ZR1443900Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 21010503100Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23DZ1202500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrathin solid-polymer-electrolytes (SPEs) are the most promising alternative substituting for the conventional liquid electrolyte to enable high-energy-density, safe lithium-metal-batteries (LMBs). Nevertheless, developing ultrathin SPEs with both high ionic conductivity, and strong Li dendrite retardant is still a significant challenge. Here a scalable fabrication of high-performance ultrathin (≈7.8 µm) polycarbonate-based electrolyte (UPCE) is proposed via electrolyte structural engineering, phase separation-derived poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVH) porous scaffold, without use of additional liquid additives. The rational electrolyte structural modulation with 1-fluoro-4-(1-methylethenyl)benzene (FMB) enables a weakened Li

Indexed as

high critical current densitylong‐cycling solid‐state Li metal batteriessolid polymer electrolyteultrathin

Identifiers

PMID40576499
PMCPMC12464653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.