Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576488›Full record

Observational studyRadiology. Imaging cancer2025

Association of Pelvic Structure Involvement and Tumor Morphology at MRI with Prognosis Following Resection in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

Davy M J Creemers, Henrik Iversen, Evi Banken, Floor Piqeur, Stijn H J Ketelaers, Alette Daniëls-Gooszen, Gabriella J Palmer, Torbjörn Holm, Harm Rutten, Chikako Suzuki and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Davy M J CreemersDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-8444-3865
Henrik IversenDepartment of Pelvic Cancer, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Colorectal Surgery Unit, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Evi BankenDepartment of GROW, School for Developmental Biology & Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Floor PiqeurDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Stijn H J KetelaersDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Alette Daniëls-GooszenDepartment of Radiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Gabriella J PalmerDepartment of Pelvic Cancer, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Colorectal Surgery Unit, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2162-1896
Torbjörn HolmDepartment of Pelvic Cancer, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Colorectal Surgery Unit, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Harm RuttenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Chikako SuzukiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Södersjukhuset and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jacobus W A BurgerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Anna MartlingDepartment of Pelvic Cancer, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Colorectal Surgery Unit, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Joost NederendDepartment of Radiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9905-5866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To determine the influence of location, extent of tissue invasion, and tumor morphology at MRI on the resectability of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) and postresection oncologic outcomes of LRRC. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational study included consecutive patients diagnosed with LRRC who underwent surgery with curative intent at the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven and Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm between January 2003 and December 2017. Two expert radiologists reviewed available MR images while adhering to a standardized reviewing checklist. The effect of pelvic structure involvement, tumor morphology on the primary outcome of resection margin status, and secondary outcomes of overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses. Results The final analysis included 328 patients with LRRC (mean age ± SD, 64.9 years ± 9.6; 126 female, 202 male). Resection margins were negative in 217 (66.2%) patients and positive in 111 patients (33.8%). Tumor size, tumor type, and border type on MR images were all associated with resectability. Central recurrences were associated with the lowest likelihood of positive resection margins (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.71;

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPelvisRectal NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAbdomen/GILocally Recurrent Rectal CancerMR-ImagingOncologyRectumSurgeryTumor Biology

Identifiers

PMID40576488
PMCPMC12304544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.