Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576459›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal2025

Endoscopic Deep Plane Facelift: A Classified Approach.

Mirza Firat

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional facelift techniques, although effective in addressing facial aging, are often associated with visible scarring and stigmas. These factors contribute to patient hesitation and a growing preference for nonsurgical alternatives. In recent years, endoscopic approaches have gained popularity by offering scar-concealed access and deep plane dissection, but many techniques lack a standardized framework for patient selection and reproducibility.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to present a systematic endoscopic facelift technique which proposes a 5-group classification system to guide patient-specific surgical planning and optimize aesthetic outcomes.

methodsA total of 393 patients underwent endoscopic facelift surgery performed by a single surgeon between 2020 and 2024. Patients were categorized into 5 groups based on facial aging patterns and anatomical needs, including brow lift, midface lift, lower facelift, and neck correction. The technique emphasized minimal skin undermining, vertical vector elevation, and cable suture suspension. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months postoperatively. Complications, revisions, and outcomes were recorded prospectively.

resultsThere were no cases of permanent nerve injury. Revision surgery for cosmetic concerns was performed in 19 patients (4.8%), most of whom were among the first 100 cases.

conclusionsThis vertical vector endoscopic facelift technique demonstrates consistent aesthetic results with low complication and revision rates. By combining a classification-based surgical strategy with minimally invasive access and deep anatomical correction, this method offers a reproducible, safe, and natural-appearing alternative to traditional facelift approaches. Future studies will aim to incorporate objective assessments and patient- reported outcome measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4: (Therapeutic).

Indexed as

EndoscopyRhytidoplastyAdultAgedEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsRejuvenationReoperationSkin AgingTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40576459
PMCPMC12548052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.