ArticleAesthetic surgery journal2025
Endoscopic Deep Plane Facelift: A Classified Approach.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Periorbital and Midface Rejuvenation with Direct Fixation: An Alternative to Suspension Techniques.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Two Endoscopic Surgical Approaches to Facial Rejuvenation: A Longitudinal Study on Safety and Patient Satisfaction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- [Facelift-quo vadis?]HNO · 2026Review
- Advanced on Minimally Invasive Techniques in Facial Rejuvenation: A Comprehensive Review.World journal of plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Lateral pretrichial subcutaneous brow lift with upper eyelid blepharoplasty.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional facelift techniques, although effective in addressing facial aging, are often associated with visible scarring and stigmas. These factors contribute to patient hesitation and a growing preference for nonsurgical alternatives. In recent years, endoscopic approaches have gained popularity by offering scar-concealed access and deep plane dissection, but many techniques lack a standardized framework for patient selection and reproducibility.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to present a systematic endoscopic facelift technique which proposes a 5-group classification system to guide patient-specific surgical planning and optimize aesthetic outcomes.
methodsA total of 393 patients underwent endoscopic facelift surgery performed by a single surgeon between 2020 and 2024. Patients were categorized into 5 groups based on facial aging patterns and anatomical needs, including brow lift, midface lift, lower facelift, and neck correction. The technique emphasized minimal skin undermining, vertical vector elevation, and cable suture suspension. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months postoperatively. Complications, revisions, and outcomes were recorded prospectively.
resultsThere were no cases of permanent nerve injury. Revision surgery for cosmetic concerns was performed in 19 patients (4.8%), most of whom were among the first 100 cases.
conclusionsThis vertical vector endoscopic facelift technique demonstrates consistent aesthetic results with low complication and revision rates. By combining a classification-based surgical strategy with minimally invasive access and deep anatomical correction, this method offers a reproducible, safe, and natural-appearing alternative to traditional facelift approaches. Future studies will aim to incorporate objective assessments and patient- reported outcome measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4: (Therapeutic).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.