ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025
Event-related brain activity in response to partners' speech in natural conversation.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How listeners cognitively process speech during natural conversation remains poorly understood, particularly in terms of the role of the speaker's and listener's subjective mental states and empathic traits. This study examined relationships between these psychological factors and listener's cognitive processing of speech. We simultaneously recorded electroencephalograms from 20 romantic couples during natural face-to-face conversations. We identified the onset times of content words using morphological analysis of the speech data. Using multivariate temporal response functions (a method to estimate stimulus-related neural responses), we analysed each listener's event-related brain activity in response to their partner's speech. We found positive associations between the speaker's interest levels and the listener's early attentional processing, as reflected in the P2 amplitude. Higher levels of personal distress, an empathic trait, corresponded with greater sustained attention among listeners, as indexed by the late positive potential. Moreover, by using brain activities along with behavioural measures of turn-taking, a support vector machine successfully distinguished between mutually satisfying and not mutually satisfying conversations. The observed associations between the cognitive processing of speech and both the speaker's mental states and the listener's empathic traits demonstrate that understanding speech processing in natural conversation requires consideration of factors from both participants not just from either the speaker or the listener.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.