Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576405›Full record

ReviewAnnals of African medicine2026

Ethical, Social, and Legal Issues Related to Precision Medicine in India: Challenges and Solutions.

Utpal Tripura, Ninad Vilas Nagrale, Oinam Gambhir Singh, Arijit Dey, J Venkatesh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Utpal TripuraDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, West Bengal, India.
Ninad Vilas Nagrale
Oinam Gambhir Singh
Arijit Dey
J Venkatesh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractPrecision medicine customizes healthcare based on individual genetics, environment, and lifestyle, offering a transformative approach to treatment. It promises improved health outcomes through precise and effective interventions. However, its implementation in India presents significant ethical, social, and legal challenges. Ethical concerns include ensuring informed consent, safeguarding patient privacy, and preventing genetic discrimination, particularly in a population with varied literacy levels and health awareness. Social barriers include high costs, rural inaccessibility, and cultural resistance to genetic testing. Legally, gaps in genetic testing regulation, unclear data ownership, and expensive patented treatments pose hurdles. Overcoming these challenges requires a comprehensive strategy, including healthcare-specific data protection policies, financial subsidies for low-income groups, and stringent regulatory frameworks. Such steps can ethically integrate precision medicine into the Indian healthcare system, balancing individual rights with its vast potential benefits and fostering equitable access to this innovative medical approach.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingPrecision MedicineDelivery of Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIndiaInformed Consentdonnées génétiquesGenetic datagenomicsgénomiqueMédecine de précisionprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID40576405
PMCPMC12872149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.