Observational studyAnnals of African medicine2026
Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Surgical Acute Abdomen in Zaria, Nigeria.
Observational study in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe purpose of the study was to determine the spectrum of diseases of surgical acute abdomen by ultrasonography and comparing the ultrasound diagnosis with the surgical diagnosis of acute abdominal conditions in a low-income resource setting. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted on consecutive patients presenting with acute abdomen to the radiology department for abdominal ultrasonography. The ultrasound diagnosis was compared with the surgical diagnosis. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for association, and Kappa statistics was used for interobserver agreement. Diagnostic performance markers included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy.
resultsThe most common conditions included appendicitis (27.5%), bowel perforation (21.7%), and ectopic pregnancy (12.5%). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 99.1%, PPV of 89.0%, NPV of 98.3%, and diagnostic accuracy of 97.6%. Sensitivities of 69.7%, 88.5%, 100.0%, and specificities of 98.9%, 96.8%, 100.0% were seen for acute appendicitis, bowel perforation, and ectopic pregnancy, respectively. There was a significant relationship between ultrasound and surgical diagnosis of most of the acute abdominal conditions ( P < 0.001) except for appendiceal abscess ( P = 0.05). Ultrasound and surgical diagnosis of all the acute abdominal conditions showed beyond chance kappa (κ) interobserver agreement (0.20< κ ≤1.00).
conclusionWith skilled hands, there is high concordance between ultrasound and surgical diagnosis of acute abdomen. Ultrasonography should be part of the initial evaluation of patients with surgical acute abdomen in a setting where emergency abdominal computed tomography is not readily available, accessible, and affordable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.