ReviewCardiology in review
Unmet Needs in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Overcoming Recalcitrant Clots.
Review in Cardiology in review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endovascular thrombectomy has revolutionized acute ischemic stroke treatment, significantly improving recanalization rates. However, up to 20% of cases involve recalcitrant clots that fail to recanalize or require multiple passes, negatively impacting clinical outcomes. This review explores the multifaceted nature of these challenging clots, including insights from preclinical, imaging, and clinical studies, with strategies to overcome them. Ex-vivo clot characterization reveals red blood cell-poorness in clots as a common feature in fibrin-rich, platelet-rich, neutrophil extracellular traps-rich, collagenous or bacteria-rich clots. Preclinical models have evolved alongside ex-vivo clot analysis, demonstrating properties such as increased stiffness, toughness, hardness, and stickiness that hinders retrieval. Imaging markers such as absence of the hyperdense artery sign or susceptibility vessel sign correlate with recalcitrant clots, although reliable predictors of recalcitrant clots remain elusive. Recent innovations, including specifically designed tough clot stent-retrievers such as Nimbus and technologies to improve complete clot ingestion such as super-bore aspiration catheters and cyclic aspiration have shown promise. Yet, a substantial proportion of cases still have difficulty or fail to achieve recanalization. Techniques such as rescue stenting and dual-stent-retriever approaches offer additional strategies but carry risks of vascular injury and complications. Major research limitations include clot deformation during retrieval and the inability to remove some clots. Furthermore, some interactions are poorly understood, such as the biological interaction between the clot and vessel wall or with circulating thrombo-influencing proteins. Overcoming these challenges can pave the pathway for creative solutions to elegantly improve the recanalization of tough clots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.