Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40576165›Full record

ReviewCancer2025

Measurable residual disease (MRD) as a surrogate end point for clinical drug approval in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Perspectives from the MRD Partnership and Alliance in AML Clinical Treatment Consortium.

Michael Boyiadzis, Andrew H Wei, Bruno Paiva, Sylvie D Freeman, Gertjan Kaspers, Brenda Chyla, Sarah Hersey, Reshma Patel, Brian Maloney, Marie-Helene Blanchet Zumofen and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Michael BoyiadzisGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Andrew H WeiPeter MacCallum Cancer Center and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bruno PaivaCancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Cima Universidad de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Sylvie D FreemanInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gertjan KaspersPrincess Máxima Cancer Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Brenda ChylaAbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sarah HerseyTranslational Sciences and Diagnostics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Summit, New Jersey, USA.
Reshma PatelJohnson and Johnson Innovative Medicine, Global Regulatory Affairs, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Brian MaloneyRegulatory Affairs, Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Marie-Helene Blanchet ZumofenF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Marlies Van HoefNovartis Pharmaceuticals AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Beate WulffF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Vanessa ObournOncology Medicine, Novartis Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Shalaka PatelPrecision Medicine and Companion Diagnostic, Bristol Myers Squibb, Greenwich, Connecticut, USA.
Daniel Lopes de MenezesTranslational Medicine, Hematology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Brisbane, California, USA.
Qian ShiDepartment of Quantitative Health Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Bourras-Rezki BengoudifaBristol Myers Squibb, Boudry, Switzerland.
Natalie DimierEarly Oncology Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., London, UK.
Thomas J PriorJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Gail J RobozClinical and Translational Leukemia Program, Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Thomas PrebetClinical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Madison, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

MRD Partnership and Alliance in AML clinical treatment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment, significant unmet medical needs remain. Surrogate end points for overall survival can accelerate the approval of novel therapies. Measurable residual disease (MRD) is a promising surrogate end point candidate, providing a sensitive and quantitative assessment of disease burden. Numerous studies have demonstrated that negative MRD status-across diverse methodologies, assessment timepoints and thresholds, patient subgroups, and clinical settings-independently predicts improved survival. Although MRD can inform therapeutic decisions at the patient level, its formal integration as a primary surrogate end point in regulatory frameworks for clinical trials requires rigorous validation. MRD Partnership and Alliance in AML Clinical Treatment (MPAACT) is a research consortium among industry and academic leaders. MPAACT actively engages with regulatory agencies, health technology assessment bodies, technology vendors, and patient groups to establish a pathway for validating MRD as a surrogate end point in AML clinical trials. For the current article, the authors reviewed the status of MRD assessment, its use in recent clinical trials, current MRD assessment methodologies, standardization, regulatory guidance, statistical approaches, and patient access considerations necessary for MRD to become a surrogate clinical trial end point. The extensive collaboration between MPAACT, global industry, and academic partners-including data sharing and resource integration-underscores the collective commitment to advancing AML therapies. Establishing MRD as a surrogate end point could accelerate the development and approval of innovative treatments, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasm, ResidualClinical Trials as TopicHumansacute myeloid leukemiameasurable residual diseaseregulatory approvalsurrogate end point

Identifiers

PMID40576165
PMCPMC12203635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.