ArticleJournal of global health2025
Using Artificial Intelligence to assess the impact of social, physical, and financial health and personality on subjective well-being in a representative, multinational sample of older European and Israeli adults.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Psychometric validation of the English version of the digital wellbeing questionnaire for young adults.PloS one · 2026Article
- Perceived Digital Well-Being Scale in the United States and United Kingdom: Psychometric Validation Study.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Subjective well-being (SWB) is an important outcome influenced by other aspects of health and personality. However, we know little about the independent effects of multiple health and personality dimensions on SWB in large, representative international samples. Artificial Intelligence (AI) models are particularly well-suited to detect multi-factor patterns in complex topics such as SWB. Methods: This study involved a representative sample of 37 991 older adults from 17 European countries and Israel. Machine-learning algorithms, general additive modelling, low-degree polynomials (i.e. splines), and regression analyses were used to determine the independent effects of the Big 5 personality traits on social, physical and financial health factors, and the impact of all of these on an aggregate measure of SWB. Results: Loneliness, overall physical health, and making ends meet were the strongest social, physical and financial health predictors of SWB, respectively (absolute value (|t|s) = 29.77-51.53). Neuroticism was a consistent, negative determinant of health (|t|s = 2.82-11.42), but reduced the adverse impact of poor physical health on SWB (|t|s = 4.57-5.98). Extraversion was linked to better social and financial health (|t|s = 2.96-7.74), but also to higher body mass index (Student's t test (t) = 13.52), while openness to experience was positively associated with social and physical health (|t|s = 3.02-7.86), but negatively related to income (t = -19.76). Conclusions: All adverse health factors and neuroticism were linked to lower SWB, while SWB was positively associated with the other health measures and personality traits. Some traits had unexpected effects on health outcomes, and some had moderating effects on the links between these outcomes and SWB, suggesting that the links between personality, health and SWB depend on the types of health considered. Future multivariate modelling is recommended to clarify the mechanisms for these and other observed relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.