SynthesisHealth policy and planning2026
Health professionals' knowledge and understanding of inclusion health: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing need for healthcare professionals to ensure that their practices are inclusive and that they are considerate of the needs of marginalized communities. Inclusion health (IH) seeks to correct the imbalances that result in health inequities and requires health practitioners to have an adequate understanding and knowledge of the needs of marginalized and vulnerable population groups. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize and critically appraise evidence from studies that explored healthcare professionals' knowledge and/or awareness of IH. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, and SocINDEX were systematically searched without any year or language limits. The last search was conducted on 16 December 2024. A total of 4870 studies were identified, of which 37 were included (21 qualitative studies, 7 quantitative studies, 6 mixed-methods studies, 2 cross-sectional studies, and 1 quasi-experimental study). The methodological quality of the studies was appraised. Most studies were from the USA and Australia and focused on IH knowledge regarding members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer community, people with disabilities, and culturally diverse populations. Studies examining healthcare professionals' knowledge and awareness were not homogenous in nature resulting in a wide variety of studies and types of data. Different minority groups require varied levels of insight and understanding from their healthcare professionals. There is therefore no one-size-fits-all solution. We recommend targeted interventions throughout the training and education of healthcare professionals, informed and designed by the participation of members of those marginalized communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.