ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Angiography-Based Blood Flow Quantification After Revascularization in Acute Coronary Syndromes.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for myocardial hypoperfusion after primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), impaired coronary blood flow (CBF) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is linked to mortality. We developed a novel angiography-based approach for blood flow quantification using automatic contrast bolus tracking. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of angiography-based blood flow quantification on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after PCI in patients with ACS.
methodsProspective, multicenter, nested case-control study of patients presenting ACS. A propensity score was used to match patients with and without MACE at 1 year of follow-up. MACE was defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, or ischemia-driven revascularization. CBF was measured automatically from angiograms after PCI.
resultsOne hundred sixty-two patients were included. The mean age was 68.3±13.0 years, 83% were male, and 33% had diabetes. Overall, 66% of patients presented with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. CBF after PCI was lower after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction compared with other clinical presentations (74.1±47.0 mL/min ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, 89.1±45.8 mL/min, non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, 95.7±48.8 mL/min, unstable angina,
conclusionsAfter PCI, automatic quantification of CBF using angiography was associated with MACE in patients with ACS. Risk stratification using post-PCI CBF-derived angiography may enable tailored management strategies for individuals with ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.