ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Evaluating discrepancies in dimensionality reduction for time-series single-cell RNA-sequencing data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimal transport analysis of high-dimensional flow cytometry data in immuno-oncology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are various dimensionality reduction techniques for visually inspecting dynamical patterns in time-series single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. However, the lack of one-to-one correspondence between cells across time points makes it difficult to uniquely uncover temporal structure in a low-dimensional manifold. The use of different techniques may thus lead to discrepancies in the representation of dynamical patterns. However, The extent of these discrepancies remains unclear. To investigate this, we propose an approach for reasoning about such discrepancies based on synthetic time-series scRNA-seq data generated by variational autoencoders. The synthetic dynamical patterns induced in a low-dimensional manifold reflect biologically plausible temporal patterns, such as dividing cell clusters during a differentiation process. We consider manifolds from different dimensionality reduction techniques, such as principal component analysis, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, uniform manifold approximation, and projection and single-cell variational inference. We illustrate how the proposed approach allows for reasoning about to what extent low-dimensional manifolds, obtained from different techniques, can capture different dynamical patterns. None of these techniques was found to be consistently superior and the results indicate that they may not reliably represent dynamics when used in isolation, underscoring the need to compare multiple perspectives. Thus, the proposed synthetic dynamical pattern approach provides a foundation for guiding future methods development to detect complex patterns in time-series scRNA-seq data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.