ArticleAnimal bioscience2026
Potential use of insect protein and phytonutrient-based tropical plant supplementation on rumen fermentation characteristics and microbial protein synthesis in Thai native beef cattle.
Article in Animal bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis experiment evaluated the use of insect protein and phytonutrient-based tropical plant supplementation on rumen fermentation characteristics and microbial protein synthesis in Thai native beef cattle. Enhancing protein utilization and promoting rumen fermentation could be achieved by combining high-protein crickets and phytonutrients from mangosteen peel and lemongrass powder to a pellet (CMLP).
methodsFour native male Thai beef cattle were randomly assigned treatments using a 4×4 Latin square design to receive four dietary treatments. The treatments were as follows: control (no supplementation), CMLP supplement at 50 g/h/d, CMLP supplement at 100 g/h/d and CMLP supplement at 150 g/h/d, respectively.
resultsResults revealed that the supplementation of CMLP in beef cattle did not influence rice straw intake, concentrate intake and total feed intake, which also enhanced the digestibility of crude protein, acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber (p<0.05). Additionally, volatile fatty acid production of propionate and bacterial population were increased (p<0.05), and protozoal populations and production of methane decreased (p<0.05) with a higher level of CMLP supplementation. Furthermore, efficiency of microbial nitrogen synthesis significantly increased by increasing the level of CMLP supplementation, particularly at 150 g.
conclusionOur results suggested that CMLP supplementation, particularly at 150 g/h/d, enhanced nutrient digestibility, increased the propionic acid proportion, and promoted microbial protein synthesis while reducing protozoal populations and methane production. CMLP showed promise as an effective dietary protein supplement that improved rumen fermentation and performance of Thai native beef cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.