ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2025
Soft Tissue Injury and Immobilization Are Both Required for Persistent Elbow Contracture in a Rat Model.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anti-Inflammatory Treatment and Active Physical Therapy Have Differing Effects on Functional, Mechanical, and Histological Properties in a Rat Model of Post-Traumatic Elbow Contracture.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Post-traumatic joint contracture commonly occurs after elbow injury. Although known as a risk factor for poor outcomes, immobilization is necessary to prevent reinjury. The objective of this study was to isolate the contribution of immobilization to mechanical and functional disability using an animal model. Left elbows of Long-Evans rats were immobilized in the absence (IM) or presence of an elbow injury (INJ+IM). Animals were immobilized for 21 or 42 days or immobilized for 21 days followed by free mobilization (FM) for 21 days. Uninjured animals without immobilization (CTRL) were also evaluated. Forelimb strength and gait were measured during FM, and joints underwent post-mortem mechanical testing. Contracture in 21IM elbows was moderate compared to CTRL but not as severe as 21INJ+IM. 42IM elbows were severely contracted compared to CTRL and not different from 42INJ+IM. 21IM/21FM mechanics were no longer different from CTRL while 21INJ+IM/21FM were still contracted. Gait was less altered for IM compared to INJ+IM and nearly returned to CTRL levels over time. Forelimb strength was not different between IM and INJ+IM but both were decreased compared to CTRL. For immobilization without injury, contracture took longer to develop but eventually reached levels of INJ+IM. Following remobilization, IM groups recovered faster and to a greater extent than INJ+IM groups. Thus, immobilization alone is not sufficient to recapitulate characteristics of human elbow PTJC (e.g., long-term loss of motion) in an animal model. Clinically, immobilization may not contribute to irreversible contracture development if duration is limited and strategic, active mobilization is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.