ArticleCancer research and treatment2026
Efficacy and Safety of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b in Low-Risk Polycythemia Vera.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complete Hematological Response Coupled with Molecular Response in Polycythemia Vera Treatment with Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Modern and multidisciplinary care in polycythemia vera.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeConventional management of low-risk polycythemia vera (PV), consisting of phlebotomy and aspirin, often fails to adequately control symptoms and hematologic parameters. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b (Ropeg) in low-risk PV patients requiring cytoreductive therapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this sub-analysis of an open-label, multicenter trial, 42 patients received Ropeg for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was a reduction in phlebotomy frequency, while secondary endpoints included complete hematologic response (CHR), changes in JAK2V617F allele burden, and safety.
resultsAmong 42 patients, Ropeg significantly reduced mean phlebotomy frequency per year from 3.0 to 0.5 (p < 0.05) and improved CHR rates (69.1% at 48 weeks). The JAK2V617F allele burden decreased, and hydroxyurea-naïve patients showed better responses. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events included elevated liver enzymes and alopecia. Most adverse events were mild or moderate, with no grade 4 or 5 events reported.
conclusionThese findings suggest that Ropeg is a promising treatment option for low-risk PV by effectively reducing the need for phlebotomy and demonstrating efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.