Trial reportCancer research and treatment2026
Adjuvant Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo for Renal Cell Carcinoma in the East Asian Subgroup of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 Study.
Trial report in Cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Immunotherapy in urological cancers: new paradigms and a systematic review of clinical trials and real-world evidence.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAdjuvant pembrolizumab improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) versus placebo in participants with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy in the global phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study. This post hoc subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab in East Asian (Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan) participants enrolled in KEYNOTE-564. MATERIALS AND
methodsEligible participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤ 17 cycles. The primary endpoint was DFS by investigator assessment. OS was a key secondary endpoint. Safety was a secondary endpoint.
resultsThe East Asian subgroup included 126 participants (pembrolizumab, n=58; placebo, n=68). Median follow-up was 62.1 months (range, 49.6 to 73.0 months). Hazard ratio for DFS with pembrolizumab versus placebo was 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.20). Median DFS was not reached with pembrolizumab versus 58.8 months with placebo; estimated 48-month rate was 61.3% versus 51.2%. Hazard ratio for OS was 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 1.49). Median OS was not reached with pembrolizumab and placebo; estimated 48-month rate was 94.8% versus 91.2%. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 70.7% of participants (29.3% grade 3 or 4) receiving pembrolizumab and 36.8% of participants (0.0% grade 3 or 4) receiving placebo. No pembrolizumab-related deaths occurred.
conclusionIn the KEYNOTE-564 East Asian subgroup, adjuvant pembrolizumab provided DFS and OS benefits versus placebo and had a safety profile consistent with the global results. These results further support pembrolizumab as adjuvant treatment for East Asian patients with RCC at increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.