Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575728›Full record

ArticleOpen life sciences2025

A

Zhenjiang Pan, Jing Bao, Shepeng Wei

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Open life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhenjiang PanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shidong Hospital, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Jing BaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shidong Hospital, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Shepeng WeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shidong Hospital, No. 999, Shiguang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas, accounting for approximately 33% of primary central nervous system tumors, are the most prevalent type in this category. Advanced age is frequently viewed as a barrier to surgical intervention, yet recent cases have challenged this perception by demonstrating successful outcomes in elderly patients. This case report aims to illustrate the feasibility and benefits of surgical treatment in older individuals. An 84-year-old patient presented with a newly diagnosed meningioma and underwent surgical tumor removal at age 88. Following a comprehensive preoperative evaluation that excluded significant comorbidities, the procedure utilized advanced surgical techniques and optimized postoperative care to ensure safety and recovery. Pathology revealed a World Health Organization grade 1 fibrous meningioma, confirming its benign nature. The patient tolerated the surgery well and recovered successfully, marking her as the oldest reported individual to undergo such treatment. This case demonstrates that advanced age does not inherently limit tumor growth or preclude surgical intervention. Through meticulous patient assessment and personalized treatment strategies, elderly patients can achieve positive outcomes. It highlights the value of a tailored approach, prioritizing overall health and specific medical needs, and supports proactive surgical management to enhance quality of life and clinical results. This challenges traditional assumptions about age-related restrictions on surgical feasibility.

Indexed as

central nervous systemde novofibrous meningiomameningiomasurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID40575728
PMCPMC12198944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.