Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575709›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2025

Data use in social science and medical articles around the world.

Brian Stacy, Lucas Kitzmüller, Xiaoyu Wang, Daniel Gerszon Mahler, Umar Serajuddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian StacyWorld Bank, Development Data Group, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3039-2004
Lucas KitzmüllerEuropean Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Office of the Chief Economist, 5 Bank St, London E14 4BG, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8161-3316
Xiaoyu WangWorld Bank, Development Data Group, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA.
Daniel Gerszon MahlerWorld Bank, Development Data Group, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-9240
Umar SerajuddinWorld Bank, Development Data Group, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2728-0894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data-driven research is key to producing evidence-based public policies, yet little is known about where data-driven research is lacking and how it can be expanded. We propose a method for tracking academic data use by country of subject in English-language social science and medicine articles, applying natural language processing to a large corpus of academic articles. The model's predictions produce country estimates of the number of articles using data that are highly correlated with a human-coded approach, with a correlation of 0.99. Analyzing more than 140,000 academic articles, we find that high-income countries are the subject of ∼50% of all papers using data, despite only making up around 17% of the world's population. Finally, we classify countries by whether they could most benefit from increasing their production or use of data, with the former applying to many poorer countries and the latter to many wealthier countries.

Indexed as

data use in academiaempirical researchglobal developmentnatural language processingstatistical systems

Identifiers

PMID40575709
PMCPMC12198491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.