Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575699›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2025

Global analysis of constraints to natural climate solution implementation.

Hilary Brumberg, Margaret Hegwood, Waverly Eichhorst, Anna LoPresti, James T Erbaugh, Timm Kroeger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hilary BrumbergDepartment of Environmental Studies, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2514-1411
Margaret HegwoodDepartment of Environmental Studies, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4848-1563
Waverly EichhorstDepartment of Environmental Studies, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-5210
Anna LoPrestiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80302, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-1529
James T ErbaughGlobal Science, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA 22203, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0602-9045
Timm KroegerGlobal Science, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA 22203, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-3774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural climate solutions (NCS) could provide over one-third of the climate mitigation needed between now and 2030 to limit warming below 2°C and support the Sustainable Development Goals. However, large disparities persist between the estimated biophysical climate mitigation potential (CMP) of NCS and their actual implementation. Social, political, informational, and economic factors contribute to this gap, but the spatial distribution of these constraints and their impacts on different NCS pathways remains poorly understood. Understanding these constraints is especially important due to the large uncertainties in NCS CMP and growing research on spatial prioritization of NCS, often based only on biophysical criteria. We identified and mapped nonbiophysical constraints to NCS implementation efficacy by conducting a systematic review of recent peer-reviewed literature across 10 high-CMP NCS pathways. From 1,821 papers, we identified 352 that provided 2,480 observations of 39 unique constraints from 135 countries. We mapped the spatial distribution of these constraints and analyzed patterns across NCS pathways and geographic classifications. Lack of funding, insufficient information on NCS management, and ineffective policies emerged as the most common constraints globally. However, each pathway and geography faced a distinct suite of interrelated constraints spanning multiple categories. These findings highlight the need for context-specific, equitable solutions, likely requiring transdisciplinary approaches and cross-sectoral collaborations. The results could also help increase accuracy of NCS CMP estimates. We discuss how adaptive management may be used for NCS initiatives at any scale to proactively diagnose co-occurring constraints at each implementation phase and to develop integrated, place-based solutions.

Indexed as

climate changeconservationnature-based climate solutionsspatial analysisSustainable Development Goals

Identifiers

PMID40575699
PMCPMC12199758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.