ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025
Outpatient orthopaedic trauma surgery: is it safe?
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study describes outcomes after outpatient operative fracture management concurrently with implementation of the 2019 Orthopaedic Trauma Association Guidelines for Musculoskeletal Pain. Primary and revision orthopaedic trauma cases were both completed, with standard comprehensive pain management regimen modeled on OTA/AO guidelines. For each procedure, the senior surgeon was assisted by the same anesthesia team. Regional anesthesia was determined by the surgeon and the anesthesiologist. Methods: This was a retrospective case series of 88 patients older than 18 years undergoing surgery for fractures and complications at an outpatient facility associated with a Level 1 trauma center. Results: The primary outcome measures were complications, emergency department visits, and reoperations. Secondary outcomes included office calls, pain control complaints, and medication refills. All data were captured by retrospective chart review. Of the 88 study patients, 52% were male and the median age was 41 years. Seventy-seven percent (68/88) received regional anesthesia at the time of surgery. A total of 7 patients (8%, 10 encounters) presented to the emergency department within 30 days. 60% of these encounters (6/10) were related to their injury. Four patients presented for pain, but none were admitted. Most (76%) of the office calls for pain were secondary to medication refill in accordance with the guidelines. Conclusions: Patients can be cared for within the outpatient setting for many complex orthopaedic trauma conditions. Appropriate patient selection, utilization of regional anesthesia in selected patients, and proper pain management are necessary to ensure safety and comfort. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.