ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Complications and Satisfaction After Adolescent Breast Reduction for Juvenile Macromastia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complications and Satisfaction After Adolescent Breast Reduction for Juvenile Macromastia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Juvenile macromastia is a rare condition of significant breast enlargement in adolescents. Reduction mammoplasties offer relief, but data on complications in adolescents are rare as opposed to data on adults. We reviewed the outcomes, complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction after reduction mammoplasties in adolescents. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a thorough search across various electronic databases for "juvenile macromastia" and "breast reduction." Only studies on women diagnosed with juvenile macromastia before 21 years of age who underwent breast reduction surgery were included. The methodological index for nonrandomized studies was used to assess study quality. Results: This meta-analysis pooled data from 11 studies. The overall pooled postoperative complication rate, based on random-effects models, was 17.5% (95% confidence interval: 9.7%-29.5%). The recurrence rate was 15.6% (95% confidence interval: 8.5%-26.9%), ranging from 0% to 52.9%. Complication rates varied widely across studies, with wound dehiscence, hematoma, and infection being the most common. Severe complications, such as nipple necrosis, were rare. Low publication bias was observed for postoperative complications, but potential bias was noted for recurrence outcomes. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the need for standardized reporting and long-term follow-up to improve the reliability of pooled estimates and to guide clinical decision-making. The high recurrence risk emphasized the need for individualized surgical approaches and careful management of risk factors, such as obesity and smoking, to improve outcomes. Despite the variability, the benefits of surgery generally outweighed the risks, with high patient satisfaction reported in the included studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.