ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Comparative analysis of IscM and IscQu in feline oral squamous cell carcinoma treatment: cytotoxic and apoptotic insights.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feline oral squamous cell carcinoma: recent advances and future perspectives.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backround: Feline oral squamous cell carcinoma (FOSCC) is the most common malignant oral tumor in cats, characterized by invasive and aggressive behavior regardless of its location. Conventional treatments, including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, often yield unsatisfactory outcomes, with tumor progression and tissue destruction frequently leading to euthanasia. In anthroposophical medicine, extracts of Methods: Using primary cultures of three FOSCC cell lines, cell viability assays were performed to assess cytotoxicity, and the effects on apoptotic cell death, cell cycle arrest, and cellular and nuclear morphology were evaluated. Additionally, mRNA expression levels of Results: The results revealed that both IscM and IscQu induced apoptotic cell death and promoted cell cycle arrest in all three FOSCC cell lines tested. IscQu exhibited relatively stronger pro-apoptotic effects compared to IscM, although no significant differences were observed among the cell lines. Conclusion: These findings suggest that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.