ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Machine learning-based prediction of carotid intima-media thickness progression: a three-year prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Imaging‑based models for predicting cerebrovascular complications of carotid stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Characterization of carotid remodeling in gestational hypertension using radiofrequency data-based vessel stiffness analysis and vector flow imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Computational intelligence using nailfold videocapillaroscopy for the prediction of carotid intima-media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort-based study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Comparative Performance of 3 Analytical Models in Identifying Associated Factors of Pulmonary Dysfunction-Depression Comorbidity: China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study-Based Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Association of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk stratification with carotid wall shear stress as measured by vector flow mapping: a study of a Chinese population.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Risk stratification in intermediate asymptomatic carotid artery disease: a multi-modal approach combining local flow dynamics and systemic clinical profiles.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early detection of subclinical atherosclerosis progression is crucial for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a recognized surrogate marker for atherosclerosis, but accurate prediction of its progression remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for predicting CIMT progression via routine clinical biomarkers. Methods: In this three-year prospective cohort study, we analyzed data from 904 participants from the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University Health Examination Cohort who underwent three consecutive annual CIMT measurements. The participants were categorized into CIMT thickening and nonthickening groups on the basis of a final CIMT ≥1.0 mm or an increase ≥0.1 mm across consecutive measurements. We evaluated seven machine learning algorithms: logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machine (SVM), elastic net, decision tree, and neural network. Model performance was assessed through discrimination (AUC, sensitivity, specificity) and calibration metrics, with Platt scaling applied to optimize probability estimates. Clinical utility was evaluated through decision curve analysis. Results: Compared with the more complex algorithms, the elastic net model demonstrated superior performance (AUC 0.754). Baseline CIMT, absolute monocyte count, sex, age, and LDL-C were identified as the most influential predictors. After Platt scaling, the calibration improved significantly across all the models. Decision curve analysis revealed a positive net benefit across a wide threshold range (0.01-0.5). On the basis of calibrated probabilities, we developed a three-tier risk stratification framework that identified distinct groups with progressively higher event rates: medium-risk (13.9%), high-risk (50.0%), and very-high-risk (60.0%). Subgroup analysis revealed better predictive performance in younger participants (<50 years), those with lower baseline CIMT (<0.8 mm), and females. Conclusion: Machine learning approaches, particularly the elastic net model, can effectively identify individuals at high risk for CIMT progression via routine clinical biomarkers. The superior performance of simpler models suggests predominantly linear relationships between predictors and CIMT progression. Following appropriate calibration, the model demonstrated strong clinical utility across diverse decision thresholds, supporting a stratified approach to atherosclerosis prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.