ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification with different fluidics systems (centurion with active sentry vs. centurion gravity) in cataract patients with eye axial length above 26 mm.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occlusion Break Surge and Anterior Chamber Stability in the Intraocular Environment of Modern Phacoemulsification: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Incidence and risk factors for retinal detachment after cataract surgery: a comparison between trainee and experienced surgeons.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Does Further Lowering Intraoperative Intraocular Pressure Reduce Surgical Invasiveness in Active-Fluidics Eight-Chop Phacoemulsification? A Fellow-Eye Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Roadmap on advances in visual and physiological optics.Journal of optics (2010) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: During cataract phacoemulsification surgery, the Alcon Centurion with Active Sentry can achieve a more stable anterior chamber, which allows a lower intraocular pressure (IOP) setting than Centurion under gravity mode. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared these two systems' impact on high myopia patients' macular blood perfusion under different IOP settings. To evaluate intra-op and post-op clinical performance of the Alcon Centurion with Active Sentry and under gravity mode in cataract patients with eye axial lengths > 26 mm. Methods: Fifty-two eyes of 43 cataract patients with axial lengths > 26 mm were enrolled and randomly divided into the active fluidics system (AFS) group using a Centurion Active Sentry handpiece under 30 mmHg IOP setting (26 eyes) and the gravity fluidics system (GFS) group in gravity mode under 80 cmH Results: We observed no significant differences in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular thickness, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), total case time, as well as ophthalmic viscoelastic devices (OVDs) usage between the two groups. However, we found less pain complaints during surgeries and a more stable macular vessel density post-surgery in the AFS group than in the GFS group, implying higher intraoperative comfort levels and less retinal ischemia during cataract surgery using Centurion with Active Sentry under low IOP settings. Conclusion: Owing to a lower IOP setting, Centurion Vision System with Active Sentry handpiece causes less retinal ischemia and pain perception during phacoemulsification for high myopia patients. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2400080875.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.