ArticleNational science review2025
Reliable prediction of protein-protein binding affinity changes upon mutations with Pythia-PPI.
Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- PreFold-dG: estimating binding affinity of protein-protein interaction from intermediate representations of protein folding model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- PythiaStudio: a one-stop protein engineering platform powered by Pythia model suite.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- HERMES: Holographic Equivariant neuRal network model for Mutational Effect and Stability prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- AIM: AI for microbiology.National science review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are essential for numerous biological functions and predicting binding affinity changes caused by mutations is crucial for understanding the impact of genetic variation and advancing protein engineering. Although machine-learning-based methods show promise in improving prediction accuracy, limited experimental data remain a significant bottleneck. In this study, we employed multitask learning and self-distillation to overcome the data limitation and improve the accuracy of protein-protein binding affinity prediction. By incorporating a mutation stability prediction task, our model achieved state-of-the-art accuracy on the SKEMPI dataset and was subsequently used to predict binding affinity changes for millions of mutations, generating an expanded dataset for self-distillation. Compared with prevalent methods, Pythia-PPI increased the Pearson's correlation between predictions and experimental data from 0.6447 to 0.7850 on the SKEMPI dataset and from 0.3654 to 0.6050 on the viral-receptor dataset. Experimental validation further confirmed its ability to identify high-affinity mutations on the CB6 antibody in complex with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 prototype receptor binding domain, with the best single-point mutant among the top 10 predictions showing a 2-fold increase in binding affinity. These findings demonstrate that Pythia-PPI is a valuable tool for analysing the fitness landscape of PPIs. A web server for Pythia-PPI is available at https://pythiappi.wulab.xyz for easy access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.